Spring 2012 (26.1) Essay

Introduction

The ICC is the product of gradual normative changes in world politics since World War II. Since the founding of the United Nations, traditional practices of sovereign immunity have been challenged by a principle of individual criminal liability for the worst violations of morality and international legal prohibitions. War crimes, crimes against humanity, genocide, and even aggression (which may be subject to the ICC’s jurisdiction within the decade) are now viewed as universal and unequivocal wrongs, and no guilty individual—whether acting in an official capacity or not—is excused by appeals to particularistic goods, such as national security or in-group solidarity, or by such exigencies as suppressing revolution or terrorism, or fighting an unjust government. With nearly 120 states parties, the 1998 Rome Statute consolidates a significant normative shift in world politics.

To read or purchase the full text of this article, click here.

More in this issue

Spring 2012 (26.1) Essay

A Brief Response to Michael Ignatieff

For me, the challenge for those committed to a global ethic is not to make better arguments, to point out more contradictions, to seek greater ...

Spring 2012 (26.1) Essay

Almost Saving Whales: The Ambiguity of Success at the International Whaling Commission [Full Text]

BY IAN HURD. The international regulation of whaling has been a tremendous success. Yet the international organization responsible for this success is in crisis.

Spring 2012 (26.1) Essay

The International Criminal Court’s Provisional Authority to Coerce

Drawing on Immanuel Kant’s political theory, I outline two reasons the ICC’s coercive authority matters for its practical and political success. First, for ...