Summer 2007 (21.2) Feature

Crime and Punishment: Holding States Accountable

Should states be held responsible and punished for violations of international law? The recent ruling by the International Court of Justice that Serbia cannot be held responsible for genocide in Bosnia reflects the predominant international legal position. But, such a position leaves open the possibility that states or non-state agents can never be held responsible for international crimes. This article argues that they can and should be. While most international ethicists and legal theorists reject the punishment of corporate entities such as states, this article argues that certain types of international violations can only be undertaken by states, and, as a result, states must be bear the responsibility for them. Drawing on some neglected strands in international law and political theory, the article sketches a potential institutional framework for the punishment of state crimes, particularly genocide and aggression.

To read or purchase the full text of this article, click here.

More in this issue

Summer 2007 (21.2) Essay

The Human Rights Council: A New Era in UN Human Rights Work? [Full Text]

Kofi Annan did more than any UN secretary-general before him to stress the close link between human rights and peace and security. With the creation ...

Summer 2007 (21.2) Feature

Liability and Just Cause

This paper is a response to Jeff McMahan's "Just Cause for War" (EIA, 19.3, 2005). It defends a more permissive, and more traditional view of just war ...

Summer 2007 (21.2) Feature

The Inconveniences of Transnational Democracy

Suprastate policy formation in such bodies as the WTO remains fundamentally exclusive of individuals within states. This article critiques the "don't kill the goose" arguments ...