The Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), an unprecedented set of global commitments to reduce various forms of human deprivation and promote human development, are set to expire in 2015. Despite their promise, the MDGs are flawed in a variety of ways. The development community is already discussing what improved development framework should replace the MDGs. I argue that global justice advocates should focus first on the procedure for developing the post-2015 development framework. Specifically, they should create spaces for citizens, especially the most marginalized and oppressed, to actively deliberate about the form and content of a future global development framework, and ensure that this deliberation receives political uptake in formal intergovernmental processes for deciding the post-2015 framework.
To read or purchase the full text of this article, click here.
More in this issue
Spring 2012 (26.1) • Essay
The ICC’s Potential for Doing Bad When Pursuing Good
In this essay I outline three possible negative consequences that could, if they constitute preponderant outcomes, indicate that the court is failing to serve an ...
Spring 2012 (26.1) • Essay
A Brief Response to Michael Ignatieff
For me, the challenge for those committed to a global ethic is not to make better arguments, to point out more contradictions, to seek greater ...

Spring 2012 (26.1) • Review
Morality and War: Can War Be Just in the Twenty-First Century? by David Fisher
Morality and War is a timely addition to contemporary just war literature. While advocating the use of just war principles to evaluate modern armed conflict, ...