Fall 2014 (28.3) Essay

A "Natural" Proposal for Addressing Climate Change

One of the fundamental challenges of climate change is that we contribute to it increment by increment, and experience it increment by increment after a considerable time lag. As a consequence, it is very difficult to see what we are doing to ourselves, to future generations, and to the living planet as a whole. There are monumental ethical issues involved, but they are obscured by the incremental nature of the process and the long time frame before reaching the concentration of greenhouse gases and the ensuing accumulation of radiant heat—and consequent climate change—that ensues.

In 1896, Svante Arrhenius published his landmark article establishing that greenhouse gases, especially carbon dioxide, trap sufficient radiant heat for the planet to be a habitable temperature for humans and other forms of life. Yet he could not have been aware that the previous ten thousand years of planetary history had been a period of unusual stability in the planet’s climate. This stability enabled the origins of agriculture and the establishment of human settlements, indeed the development of civilization. Essentially, the entire human enterprise is based on the assumption of a stable climate.

Entire article is available to subscribers only. To access, click here.

More in this issue

Fall 2014 (28.3) Review

Just Freedom: A Moral Compass for a Complex World by Philip Pettit

An innovative and resonate work, this book explores new ground in Pettit’s ongoing attempt to articulate the importance of republicanism in the modern age.

Fall 2014 (28.3) Essay

Who Are Atrocity’s “Real” Perpetrators, Who Its “True” Victims and Beneficiaries?

Modern law’s response to mass atrocities vacillates equivocally in how it understands the dramatis personae to these expansive tragedies, at once extraordinary and ubiquitous.

Fall 2014 (28.3) Essay

Moral Collapse in a Warming World

When it comes to climate change, moral corruption prevails not because the situation is inherently murky, but because confusion has been deliberately sown.