Muslim Discourse on Rebellion

| January 2014
Facebook Twitter Email
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Within Islamic thought, the judgments pertaining to rebels constitute a subset of the larger category of “judgments pertaining to armed struggle” (ahkam al-jihad). Indeed, one might refer to the latter as the overarching name for a Muslim war convention, which would then include judgments pertaining to military actions intended to: (a) extend or enhance the territory in which Islam provides governance or serves as the established religion of state; (b) defend the Islamic territory against invaders; and (c) regulate the relations between various groups within the territory of Islam, including (i) ahl al-dhimma, the “protected” class of non-Muslims (Christians, Jews, and others), (ii) apostates (Muslims who stand accused of abandoning Islam), (iii) highwaymen and other renegades, and (iv) secessionists and rebels (ahl al-khawarij wa al-bughat).

As we consider Muslim discourse about rebellion, it is worth summarizing some of the salient features of this latter tradition.

To read or purchase the full text of this article, click here.


Facebook Twitter Email

Category: Issue 27.4, Roundtable: The Ethics of Rebellion

Comments are closed.