Summer 2016 (30.2) • Essay

The Democratic Roots of Expatriation

Patti Tamara Lenard assesses the justifications given for the right to revoke citizenship in democratic states and concludes that this practice is inconsistent with a commitment to democratic equality. She provides three normative reasons for the mismatch between democratic principles and revocation laws: that the practice of revocation discriminates between different citizens within each state; that it provides differential penalties for the same crime; and that it does not provide transparent justification or due process for this harsh punishment. Although I too am repulsed by this practice, I do not think it is necessarily undemocratic. Moreover, such analysis overlooks one legitimate motivation behind expatriation: the aim to regulate national allegiance. The new revocation initiatives act as a powerful symbolic tool in reinforcing a world order based on sovereign nation-states.

Full article available to subscribers only. Access the article here.

More in this issue

Summer 2016 (30.2) • Essay

Equality as a Global Goal

The MDGs were often criticized for having a “blind spot” with regard to inequality and social injustice. Worse, they may even have contributed to entrenched ...

Summer 2016 (30.2) • Essay

The Possibilities and Pitfalls of Humanitarian Drones

What comes to mind when we hear the word “drone”? For many of us, it is the image of a General Atomics MQ-1B Predator ...

Summer 2016 (30.2) • Essay

Accountability for the Sustainable Development Goals: A Lost Opportunity?

The question of accountability—or, more precisely, the question of how governments will be held to account for implementing the commitments made in this new ...