When Democracies Denationalize: The Epistemological Case against Revoking Citizenship

| June 10, 2016
Facebook Twitter Email
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Discomfort with denationalization spans both proceduralist and consequentialist objections. I augment Patti Lenard’s arguments against denationalization with an epistemological argument. What makes denationalization problematic for democratic theorists are not simply the procedures used to impose this penalty or its consequences but also the permanence of this type of punishment. Because democratic theory assumes citizens to be subject to developmental processes that can substantially alter a person’s character in politically relevant ways, I argue in favor of states imposing only revocable punishments. Penalties removing people’s rights and political standing must be accompanied by avenues for periodic reconsideration of such punishments in order to meet Lenard’s standard of democratic legitimacy.

Full article available to subscribers only. Access the article here.

Facebook Twitter Email

Category: Exchange: Democracies and the Power to Revoke Citizenship, Issue 30.2, Response

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *